Art plays a vital part in making life infinitely richer. In this regard, art arouses diverse regions of the brain and makes people laugh or else makes them to protest, with a complete scale of sensation in between. It gives people a means of finding creativity as well as expressing themselves. One could therefore surmise that "Art is something that makes us more thoughtful and well-rounded humans" (Beuys 34). Conversely, art forms such a large part of daily life that it is virtually impossible to assume that it does not exist. For instance, take the table to had breakfast on this morning or the coffee mug you are holding in your hand or the shirt you are wearing, aren’t these forms of art? Indeed they are. One can thus conclude that art is not only functional, but also aesthetically pleasing to the beholder. Further, it is not lost to conclude that art is exists in a state of constant change and therefore none can actually place a finger on what art really is. Finally, art is skewed and has different meanings to different individuals (Beuys 43).
The Ontology of Art
The central theme revolving around the ontology of art is predicated on the following key questions. What kinds of entities comprise art works? Are they ideal forms, physical objects, fantasy entities or are they part of something else? From an ontological perspective, it is thus important to establish the reaction between various art forms and mental states in regards to the viewer or the artist, to material objects, or else to auditory, visual and linguistic structures. Further, the ontology of art is concerned with art works exist, survive and stop to exist.
The question about the existence, survival and end of art is quite dissimilar from the how or whether “art” can be defined. This ontological question does not focus on the conditions that must be met by an entity for it to qualify as art, but instead on diverse entities recognized as paradigm meeting the broader definition of art in diverse genres. From this submission, it is evident that that it is not easy provide a resolute answer to “what is art” but the answers to these questions give the ontological status in regards to various art works built on people’s primary understanding of art as well as associated practices. In this regard, the ontology of art is concerned with a coherent understanding of the origins, and the historical as well as cultural circumstances that inspired the creation of a particular work of art and through the creativeness and imaginative nature of the artist, author or composer.
According to Aristotle, the ontology of art is concerned with the elements of tragedy and functionality of art as regards the search of ideas regarding the nature of art works from a general perspective. Aristotle therefore feels that the ontology of art should be limited discourses focused on the questions mentioned herein as opposed to making conjectures pertaining to exegetical topics. Descartes on the other hand uses the ontology of art to justify the existence of God via abstract reasoning provoked by various forms of art. He asserts that God exists based on this ontological view. He thus equates the existence of God to the explication of the ontology of art.
Art lacks an adequate definition but is simpler to just describe it a means of doing something. In other words, art refers to the employment of skills as well as imagination to create aesthetic objects, experiences or environments.
|Looking at Art||Art History|